In a significant development, Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) have endorsed plans for the implementation of an EU-wide digital wallet, signaling a pivotal moment in the realm of digital identity and privacy.
The EU Digital Wallet is a comprehensive platform designed to authenticate users and grant access to both public and private services. It facilitates the storage, sharing, and electronic signing of documents, providing citizens with a versatile tool for navigating the digital landscape. Crucially, it includes a privacy dashboard, empowering users with full control over their data. Importantly, participation in the EU Digital Wallet scheme is voluntary, respecting individual choice and autonomy.
MEPs have secured several provisions to safeguard citizens’ rights and ensure the inclusivity and integrity of the digital system. Notably, the legislation mandates the provision of free “qualified electronic signatures” for EU wallet users, enhancing the legal validity of digital transactions. Additionally, the adoption of an open-source wallet promotes transparency, innovation, and security. Stringent rules have been set for the registration and oversight of companies involved, ensuring accountability and traceability.
In summary, the MEPs’ support for an EU-wide digital wallet represents a significant step towards digital empowerment and privacy protection for EU citizens. It underscores the EU’s commitment to shaping a secure and inclusive digital future.
***
DPOrganizer reported recently (DP News, week 8) that a coalition of 28 organizations had voiced opposition to Meta platforms new subscription service in Europe. Regarding the matter previously reported, the European Commission has now taken action under the Digital Services Act (DSA), formally requesting information from Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram.
In response to concerns over the Subscription for no Ads options on both platforms, the Commission has sent Meta a request for information (RFI). Meta is tasked with providing additional details on its efforts to comply with obligations regarding advertising practices, recommender systems, and risk assessments associated with the introduction of this subscription option.
This RFI builds on previous inquiries sent to Meta since October 2023, addressing issues such as terrorist content, risk management in civic discourse and election processes, and the protection of minors. It specifically requests information on Meta’s risk assessment methodology, measures for protecting minors, handling of elections and manipulated media, as well as the practice of “shadow banning” and the launch of Threads.
Meta is required to submit the requested information by 15 March and 22 March 2024, respectively. Failure to comply may result in penalties under Article 74(2) of the DSA. The Commission will assess Meta’s responses to determine further action, potentially including formal proceedings under Article 66 of the DSA.
This latest move underscores the Commission’s commitment to ensuring transparency, accountability, and compliance within the digital sphere. As discussions surrounding online platforms and their responsibilities continue to evolve, regulatory oversight remains paramount in safeguarding users and promoting a secure digital environment.
***
Spanish supervisory authority (AEPD) has published guidance on evaluating human intervention in automated decision-making.
According to the guidance, evaluation of whether human supervision is possible and effective involves looking into both the system used and the treatment and its context. To carry out this evaluation systematically, it is recommended to objectively assess a person’s participation in the decision process according to 4 criterions relating to person’s skilset: (i) Competence and authority; (ii) Preparation and training; (iii) Independence and diligence; (iv) Means to be able to exercise their skills.
***
As GRC World Forums report, Paul Tang, a Member of the European Parliament, has raised concerns about the UK’s new Data Protection and Digital Information Bill (DPDI) and its potential to undermine elements of the GDPR.
Tang’s recent letter states that the proposed UK bill might weaken the GDPR’s protection for EU citizens and could potentially violate the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement. Last year it was reported how Westminster’s plan to replace its version of the GDPR turned heads in Brussels, largely due to its potential to affect the EU-UK data adequacy agreement. There are now concerns that the proposed changes might allow EU citizens’ data to be shared with third parties who do not meet the EU’s strict data protection standards.
Comments are closed.